"So, the question is whether Obama will feel the Roosevelt-tug, or whether he will continue to dive into the middle -- or worse -- in response to voter anger. I would suggest that the answer depends less on Obama and more on us. Will we be in the streets around war, or will we be sending emails reflecting our despair? Will the unemployed be organized through groups like ACORN, National People's Action, and labor unions, or will they simply be a statistic that is referenced in speeches? Will workers move to organize despite every obstacle that corporate America puts before them, or will they cringe awaiting the next pink slip? These are the sorts of questions that progressives need to be asking and, more importantly, acting upon.
"I am tired of the complaints; it is time to get moving." -- Bill Fletcher, Jr.
(BlackCommentator.com 2010-01-21)
Reform: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of change
Slams health bill 'madness'
"Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) on Wednesday said the Massachusetts election was a 'wake up call' for Democrats and that his party had better change course or it could suffer devastating losses come November.
"'People elected Democrats in 2008 to change the country's direction,' he told Raw Story in a nearly hour-long interview.
"'And the same entrenched interests that George Bush could not shake, this current White House is having great difficulty in shaking. One could suggest they might be more entrenched than ever.'
Kucinich staunchly defended liberalism but alleged that Democrats are not behaving like liberals.
"'There's nothing liberal about the bailouts. There's nothing liberal about standing by and watching banks use public money to get their executive bonuses. There's nothing liberal about giving insurance companies carte blanche to charge anything they want for health care...Since when did that become liberal?'"
The rest of the story: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of change by Sahil Kapur (The Raw Story 2010-01-21)
"Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) on Wednesday said the Massachusetts election was a 'wake up call' for Democrats and that his party had better change course or it could suffer devastating losses come November.
"'People elected Democrats in 2008 to change the country's direction,' he told Raw Story in a nearly hour-long interview.
"'And the same entrenched interests that George Bush could not shake, this current White House is having great difficulty in shaking. One could suggest they might be more entrenched than ever.'
Kucinich staunchly defended liberalism but alleged that Democrats are not behaving like liberals.
"'There's nothing liberal about the bailouts. There's nothing liberal about standing by and watching banks use public money to get their executive bonuses. There's nothing liberal about giving insurance companies carte blanche to charge anything they want for health care...Since when did that become liberal?'"
The rest of the story: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of change by Sahil Kapur (The Raw Story 2010-01-21)
From the Self-Parody Desk:
Congress is considering an amendment to the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act that would exempt used car salesmen from consumer fraud protections.
Politics: It's about policy, not personality
Barack Obama and the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate came into office a year ago in the middle of an economic -- and political -- crisis at least as profound as anything we have faced as a nation since the 1930s. Our infrastructure is in tatters; our educational system is starved for resources; poverty is growing; joblessness is unconscionably high; we are in the grip of a military-industrial oligarchy that is squandering what is left of our wealth; the federal deficit is huge and growing and we are indebted to foreign powers, some of which do not necessarily wish us well; we are embroiled in two wars and several smaller actions; democracy is crippled by political compromises made more than two centuries ago and unaddressed since; we are the only industrialized nation without some form of affordable, universal health care; economic justice is further from our reach than it was 50 years ago...
Obama ran to the right of his party; though he promised "change," there was no reasonable expectation from the specific proposals he made during the campaign that he would address any of these problems. Still, a populace desperate for a new beginning placed their hopes in his hands. Franklin Roosevelt, too, ran as a conservative, but once in office he enthusiastically embraced any proposal that looked like it might improve the lives of average people. If the voters thought they were electing a Roosevelt last year, they were kidding themselves; but it wasn't unreasonable to hope an Obama administration might catch at least a little of the New Deal spirit.
Yesterday, in true blue Massachusetts, the voters rendered their verdict on the Democrats' first year. Yes, there were other factors, including Martha Coakley's limits as a campaigner -- the outcome was probably determined the evening the AG won the primary -- and Scott Brown's personal appeal, but it's clear that dissatisfaction with the performance of the national Democrats compelled Brown's win. As SEIU president Andy Stern put it, "Make no mistake, political paralysis resulted in electoral failure."
Despite evidence to the contrary, Lawrence Lessig sees an opportunity to end paralysis of our political system, namely by adopting citizen-funded elections to break control of monied interests. Here's what he had to say:
Action: Join Change Congress
Obama ran to the right of his party; though he promised "change," there was no reasonable expectation from the specific proposals he made during the campaign that he would address any of these problems. Still, a populace desperate for a new beginning placed their hopes in his hands. Franklin Roosevelt, too, ran as a conservative, but once in office he enthusiastically embraced any proposal that looked like it might improve the lives of average people. If the voters thought they were electing a Roosevelt last year, they were kidding themselves; but it wasn't unreasonable to hope an Obama administration might catch at least a little of the New Deal spirit.
Yesterday, in true blue Massachusetts, the voters rendered their verdict on the Democrats' first year. Yes, there were other factors, including Martha Coakley's limits as a campaigner -- the outcome was probably determined the evening the AG won the primary -- and Scott Brown's personal appeal, but it's clear that dissatisfaction with the performance of the national Democrats compelled Brown's win. As SEIU president Andy Stern put it, "Make no mistake, political paralysis resulted in electoral failure."
Despite evidence to the contrary, Lawrence Lessig sees an opportunity to end paralysis of our political system, namely by adopting citizen-funded elections to break control of monied interests. Here's what he had to say:
Today is the one-year anniversary of President Obama's inauguration, and it comes at a remarkable moment in his presidency.
Yesterday, the voters in my home state of Massachusetts elected a Republican to serve in the seat once held by Senator Ted Kennedy -- a stunning reminder that for millions of people, the last election wasn't just about one man, but about a deep-seated desire for change.
One year ago today was a moment when many things felt possible, whether or not you supported Obama and his agenda -- when it seemed as if a broken political system might finally have gasped its last breath.
One year later -- with the fate of its signature legislative priority in jeopardy and voters even in a deep blue state saying they still aren't satisfied with the ways of Washington -- it's clear that this administration is an opportunity missed. But it's not, I believe, because Obama is too liberal, nor because he's not liberal enough. Not because this administration has been too defensive, too aggressive, too slow or too quick to act. It's because we have a system in Washington that simply does not -- will not -- allow the kind of change we urgently need.
After one year, we've now seen conclusively that even a transformative figure in the Oval Office can't transform the way Washington works, or dispel the skepticism the voters feel toward their government.
I've filmed a new installment of the Change Congress Chronicles explaining why progressives and conservatives alike should be outraged by what we've seen this past year. Please watch it today:
http://action.change-congress.org/YearOne
As you know, today is also the day we might get a landmark decision from the Supreme Court that could poison the system even further, giving corporations unlimited license to use their money to affect elections in this country. It's a big day.
Action: Join Change Congress
Politics: Ted Kennedy's seat. Ironic, huh?
Of course, sending Scott Brown to the Senate will do nothing to create jobs or end the war in Afghanistan or secure universal, affordable health care. But then neither would have electing a middle-of-the-road party hack like Martha Coakley. The Democrats have an 18-vote majority in the Senate. If they can't pass a jobs program or genuine health care reform, it won't be the fault of Senator Brown. But don't set your expectations too high. As Jon Stewart says, if the Democrats set the bar on the ground, they'd still manage to trip over it.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Mass Backwards | ||||
| ||||
Politics: More bipartisanship, this time on debt & taxes
White House, Democratic lawmakers cut deal on deficit commission (Washington Post)
"Faced with growing alarm over the nation's soaring debt, the White House and congressional Democrats tentatively agreed Tuesday to create an independent budget commission and to put its recommendations for fiscal solvency to a vote in Congress by the end of this year.
"Under the agreement, President Obama would issue an executive order to create an 18-member panel that would be granted broad authority to propose changes in the tax code and in the massive federal entitlement programs -- including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security -- that threaten to drive the nation's debt to levels not seen since World War II....
"Fourteen commission members would have to agree on any deficit-reduction plan, a prospect that skeptics called a recipe for gridlock because action would depend on the support of at least two Republicans for a plan that is sure to include tax increases. Meanwhile, many influential interest groups -- including some unions and AARP -- have lined up in opposition to giving an outside commission power to cut federal spending and are likely to pressure Democrats to resist sharp budget cuts."
The rest of the story: White House, Democratic lawmakers cut deal on deficit commission by Lori Montgomery (Washington Post 2010-01-20)
"Faced with growing alarm over the nation's soaring debt, the White House and congressional Democrats tentatively agreed Tuesday to create an independent budget commission and to put its recommendations for fiscal solvency to a vote in Congress by the end of this year.
"Under the agreement, President Obama would issue an executive order to create an 18-member panel that would be granted broad authority to propose changes in the tax code and in the massive federal entitlement programs -- including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security -- that threaten to drive the nation's debt to levels not seen since World War II....
"Fourteen commission members would have to agree on any deficit-reduction plan, a prospect that skeptics called a recipe for gridlock because action would depend on the support of at least two Republicans for a plan that is sure to include tax increases. Meanwhile, many influential interest groups -- including some unions and AARP -- have lined up in opposition to giving an outside commission power to cut federal spending and are likely to pressure Democrats to resist sharp budget cuts."
The rest of the story: White House, Democratic lawmakers cut deal on deficit commission by Lori Montgomery (Washington Post 2010-01-20)
Politics: A New Deal, a Fair Deal, a Great Society... or business as usual?
In this state-of-the-union address from January 4, 1965, Lyndon Johnson outlines his vision for a Great Society, following in the tradition of the New Deal and the Fair Deal. Perhaps President Obama will be moved to give it a listen as he prepares for his own speech to the nation next week.
You can also watch the speech and read the entire transcript at UVA's Miller Center of Public Affairs.
Johnson said:
See, also: President Franklin Roosevelt's call for economic justice during his 1944 state of the union address: Economic Bill of Rights proposed by Franklin Roosevelt
You can also watch the speech and read the entire transcript at UVA's Miller Center of Public Affairs.
Johnson said:
...We built this nation to serve its people.As president, Johnson envisioned and tried to accomplish a society that would provide equal opportunity to all Americans, that would seek to improve the quality of life for all. In the end, his Great Society was a remarkable achievement. Without such legislation as Head Start, higher-education loans and scholarships, Medicare, Medicaid, clear air and clean water programs, and civil rights, life would be even nastier, more brutish, and shorter for millions of Americans than it now is, even after 40 years of retrenchment.
We want to grow and build and create, but we want progress to be the servant and not the master of man.
We do not intend to live in the midst of abundance, isolated from neighbors and nature, confined by blighted cities and bleak suburbs, stunted by a poverty of learning and an emptiness of leisure.
The Great Society asks not how much, but how good; not only how to create wealth but how to use it; not only how fast we are going, but where we are headed.
It proposes as the first test for a nation: the quality of its people.
This kind of society will not flower spontaneously from swelling riches and surging power.
It will not be the gift of government or the creation of Presidents. It will require of every American, for many generations, both faith in the destination and the fortitude to make the journey.
And like freedom itself, it will always be challenge and not fulfillment. And tonight we accept that challenge.
I propose that we begin a program in education to ensure every American child the fullest development of his mind and skills.
I propose that we begin a massive attack on crippling and killing diseases.
I propose that we launch a national effort to make the American city a better and a more stimulating place to live.
I propose that we increase the beauty of America and end the poisoning of our rivers and the air that we breathe.
I propose that we carry out a new program to develop regions of our country that are now suffering from distress and depression.
I propose that we make new efforts to control and prevent crime and delinquency.
I propose that we eliminate every remaining obstacle to the right and the opportunity to vote.
I propose that we honor and support the achievements of thought and the creations of art...
See, also: President Franklin Roosevelt's call for economic justice during his 1944 state of the union address: Economic Bill of Rights proposed by Franklin Roosevelt
Capitalism: Stop Them Before They Shock Again
Naomi Klein Issues Haiti Disaster Capitalism Alert
Speaking to Amy Goodman in New York, journalist Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, addressed the crisis in Haiti: “We have to be absolutely clear that this tragedy — which is part natural, part unnatural — must, under no circumstances, be used to, one, further in debt Haiti and, two, to push through unpopular corporatist policies in the interest of our corporations."
The first headlines told the story: Aid came quickly -- food, water, medicine, rescue workers -- from Europe and the United States, Israel, China, neighboring Cuba, tiny Iceland, from American citizens in power boats and Cessnas....but what came first from the United States government was troops. As wearisome as it is to say in the face of the appalling conditions in Haiti today, the long-term needs of this abused people need to be addressed now, too. Like a vacant lot in the South Bronx, Haiti is now on the market. It will be a further tragedy if, like the gorgeous beaches of Southeast Asia after the tsunamis or the buildable land in New Orleans post-Katrina, the country is auctioned off to exploiters at firesale prices.
For more on the history of American militarism in Haiti, visit Amy Goodman's Democracy Now!
Further reading: Naomi Klein's website.
Disaster Profiteering: US 'Security' Companies Offer 'Services' in Haiti by Jeremy Scahill (Common Dreams 2010-01-18)
Another take: The Right Testicle of Hell: History of a Haitian Holocaust by Greg Palast (Greg Palast 2010-01-17)
Update: More Pain for Devastated Haiti: Under the Pretense of Disaster Relief, U.S. Running a Military Occupation by Arun Gupta (AlterNet 2010-02-12)
Speaking to Amy Goodman in New York, journalist Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, addressed the crisis in Haiti: “We have to be absolutely clear that this tragedy — which is part natural, part unnatural — must, under no circumstances, be used to, one, further in debt Haiti and, two, to push through unpopular corporatist policies in the interest of our corporations."
The first headlines told the story: Aid came quickly -- food, water, medicine, rescue workers -- from Europe and the United States, Israel, China, neighboring Cuba, tiny Iceland, from American citizens in power boats and Cessnas....but what came first from the United States government was troops. As wearisome as it is to say in the face of the appalling conditions in Haiti today, the long-term needs of this abused people need to be addressed now, too. Like a vacant lot in the South Bronx, Haiti is now on the market. It will be a further tragedy if, like the gorgeous beaches of Southeast Asia after the tsunamis or the buildable land in New Orleans post-Katrina, the country is auctioned off to exploiters at firesale prices.
For more on the history of American militarism in Haiti, visit Amy Goodman's Democracy Now!
Further reading: Naomi Klein's website.
Disaster Profiteering: US 'Security' Companies Offer 'Services' in Haiti by Jeremy Scahill (Common Dreams 2010-01-18)
Another take: The Right Testicle of Hell: History of a Haitian Holocaust by Greg Palast (Greg Palast 2010-01-17)
Update: More Pain for Devastated Haiti: Under the Pretense of Disaster Relief, U.S. Running a Military Occupation by Arun Gupta (AlterNet 2010-02-12)
Talks: The Unipolar Moment and the Culture of Imperialism
Noam Chomsky delivers the 5th Annual Edward Said Memorial Lecture Columbia University School for International Affairs for the Heyman Center for the Humanities. After paying homage to Edward Said's stress on imperialism as central to our culture, Chomsky builds his case with telling rationalizations and denials by American leaders from the extermination of Native Americans through United States terrorism in Latin and South America -- in Chile, Brazil, El Salvador, Panama, Nicaragua -- and the Middle East.
Energy: Are US biofuels policies flawed?
"We need to set realistic targets for ethanol in the United States instead of just throwing taxpayer money out the window." -- Amy Myers Jaffe, associate director of the Rice Energy Program and a contributor to the report.
A few years ago, when biofuel and blogging were both just heating up, I registered biodieselbloggerdude.com (yeah, whatever) with the idea of vanning around the countryside on a tankful of curly fries waste chatting up the entrepreneurs and alchemists who were turning animal and vegetable fat into black gold. About three hours later, having poked about in publicly available sources, I realized the idea of finding the country's energy needs in the compost pile was at best a fantasy and at worst a scam.
Now Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy has released a study citing the economic, environmental
and logistical shortcomings of the U.S. government's efforts to promote of biofuels as alternatives to coal, gas and oil.Fundamentals of a Sustainable U.S. Biofuels Policy (pdf) asks whether the $ billions in federal subsidies and protectionist tariffs that go to domestic ethanol producers every year is money well spent. According to the report, in 2008 "the U.S. government spent $4 billion in biofuels subsidies to replace roughly 2 percent of the U.S. gasoline supply. The average cost to the taxpayer of those 'substituted' barrels of gasoline was roughly $82 a barrel, or $1.95 per gallon on top of the retail gasoline price (i.e., what consumers pay at the pump)." The researchers find little evidence that mandated volumes for biofuels can be met or that biofuels are improving the environment or energy security.
In fact, they say, "[i]ncreases in corn-based ethanol production in the Midwest could cause an increase in detrimental regional environmental impacts, including exacerbating damage to ecosystems and fisheries along the Mississippi River and in the Gulf of Mexico and creating water shortages in some areas experiencing significant increases in fuel crop irrigation." Moreover, they challenge the claim that ethanol use lowers greenhouse gas emissions: "There is no scientific consensus on the climate-friendly nature of U.S.-produced corn-based ethanol, and it should not be credited with reducing GHGs when compared to the burning of traditional gasoline."
In 2007, Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) mandating production targets for "renewable fuels," mainly biodiesel and ethanol. The bill set out ambitious production targets beginning in 2008 at 9 billion gallons per year of biofuels and rising to 36 billion gallons per year by 2022. The law caps corn ethanol at 15 billion gallons per year, but according to the study even that level will be difficult to reach given logistical and commercial barriers.
EISA also called for 21 billion gallons of advanced biofuels, produced from sources like switchgrass, corn stover and algae, to be included in the nation’s fuel supply by 2022. However, the report finds "existing mandated targets for advanced biofuels are not currently achievable -- scientifically or commercially -- and should be revisited."
Finally, the report questions the efficacy of the tariff imposed on ethanol imported from Latin America and the Caribbean. Because sustainable production of U.S. domestic corn-based ethanol can't or won't happen, the report finds "tariff policies that block cheaper imports are probably misguided....we believe on balance that the economic and geopolitical benefits to this trade with select regional suppliers would outweigh any 'energy security' costs to having some larger percentage of U.S. ethanol supplies arriving from foreign sources."
It should be noted that the study was supported by a research grant in environmental engineering from Chevron Technology Ventures.
Of course, the Rice study doesn't answer questions about what combination of energy sources -- solar, thermal, wind, nuclear, biological or otherwise -- will be needed to liberate us successfully from dependence on oil and coal. But a functioning society is a fact-based enterprise and the report provides additional data to use as we try to devise a workable national energy policy.
The rest of the story: Fundamentals of a Sustainable U.S. Biofuels Policy (Publications from the Rice Energy Program initiative on U.S. Biofuels Policy)
See, also: Is Algae Worse than Corn for Biofuels? (Scientific American 2010-01-22)
2010: In surprise move, progressives endorse a progressive candidate for office
So this is in today's email:
Jonathan Tasini for Senate
Jonathan Tasini's blog on Working Life (Labor Research Association)
Jonathan Tasini for Senate from New York State by David Swanson (Let's Try Democracy 2009-06-11)
Action: Donate to Jonathan Tasini for Senate (ActBlue)
Volunteer for Tasini for Senate
Click here to watch the videoI can't see how this can be construed as anything less than an endorsement of the progressive candidate in the primary, Jonathan Tasini. Can you?
Dear John,
New Yorkers are getting acquainted with their new neighbor, former Tennessee Congressman and bank executive Harold Ford, Jr. So far, we've learned that he rides around town in a chauffeured car, breakfasts at the Regency Hotel on Park Avenue, gets regular pedicures, and visited Staten Island once in his life, by helicopter.
What else do we know about the REAL Harold Ford? Well, for starters, he's a staunch opponent of abortion rights. He also disapproves of marriage equality for gay couples, opposes public safety laws to keep guns off the streets, and blames immigrants for America's problems.
Doesn't sound like much of a New Yorker, does he?
I grew up in New York. New York is a vibrant, tolerant, diverse community with forward-looking people with progressive social values. That's the New York I recall and love. That New York has nothing in common with Harold Ford, Jr. Now that he's living in Manhattan instead of south of the Mason-Dixon line, Ford is remaking himself as a pro-choice, pro-gay, pro-gun control progressive.
That's why we compiled this video of the REAL Harold Ford, Jr., to show New Yorkers who their latest carpetbagger really is. Join us and our partners at Planned Parenthood Advocates of New York, NARAL New York and Make the Road New York in spreading the word.
Share this video with every New Yorker you know
Yours, Robert Greenwald and the Brave New Films team
Jonathan Tasini for Senate
Jonathan Tasini's blog on Working Life (Labor Research Association)
Jonathan Tasini for Senate from New York State by David Swanson (Let's Try Democracy 2009-06-11)
Action: Donate to Jonathan Tasini for Senate (ActBlue)
Volunteer for Tasini for Senate
Tweedlededum Tweedlededee
No progressive should waste a jot of energy on whether Harold Ford or Kirsten Gillibrand wins the New York senate primary. Only Jonathan Tasini will make a difference.
Overheard:
Mother to son (riding through San Diego Zoo's Safari Park):
"Aren't these animals lucky to be living in America?"
Government: Analysis of the Affordable Health Care for America Act
Using a microsimulation model, this RAND analysis estimates the effects of the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) on the number of uninsured, the costs to the federal government and the nation, revenues from penalty payments, and consumers' health care spending. Key finding: the House version of health care reform would cut the number of uninsured Americans to 24 million by 2019 (a 56% decrease) and increase personal spending on health care by about 3.3% cumulatively between 2013 and 2019.
Read Analysis of the Affordable Health Care for America Act (pdf) by Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Jeanne S. Ringel, Federico Girosi (RAND Publications)
See, also: Side-by-side comparison of the House & Senate health care reform bills (H.R. 3962 and H.R. 3590) as of January 7, 2010 (Rand Publications)
Read Analysis of the Affordable Health Care for America Act (pdf) by Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Jeanne S. Ringel, Federico Girosi (RAND Publications)
See, also: Side-by-side comparison of the House & Senate health care reform bills (H.R. 3962 and H.R. 3590) as of January 7, 2010 (Rand Publications)
Creativity: Funding
Kickstarter offers a way to get involved in funding of the work of artists, designers, filmmakers, musicians, journalists, inventors, explorers, and so on. What is Kickstarter? So this isn't about investing? Who can fund their project on Kickstarter? How does someone start a project? How does funding work?
The rest of the story: KickStarter
Read: KickStarter's blog
The rest of the story: KickStarter
Read: KickStarter's blog
Action: We Need A Hero health care reform petition
To Senators Feingold, Sanders, Franken and Brown: "We need a hero -- someone who will fight for the will of the American people by declaring they will only vote for a final bill if it has a public option. That would be change we can believe in."
Sign the petition (Progressive Change Campaign Committee)
Sign the petition (Progressive Change Campaign Committee)
Fear of Flying
Homeland Security overreacts again, this time to the underwear bomber. Let's hope the next guy doesn't use a suppository.
Accountability: On Christmas Eve, Massive bailouts to Big Ins/Big Pharma by Senate AND to Freddie/Fannie by WH
by Seafan (Democratic Underground)
How long did they think this would go unnoticed? The caliber of this corporate robbery of the public purse is astronomical, unprecedented and facilitated by this administration. There is no looking away from this.
Many of us were unwilling witnesses to the giveaway to Big Health Insurance/Big Pharma, courtesy of the US Senate on Christmas Eve.
But on the same day, the White House announced an unlimited credit line at the disposal of troubled Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
Some days are just spectacular for the chosen few, aren't they? Read more at Democratic Underground.
How long did they think this would go unnoticed? The caliber of this corporate robbery of the public purse is astronomical, unprecedented and facilitated by this administration. There is no looking away from this.
Many of us were unwilling witnesses to the giveaway to Big Health Insurance/Big Pharma, courtesy of the US Senate on Christmas Eve.
But on the same day, the White House announced an unlimited credit line at the disposal of troubled Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
Some days are just spectacular for the chosen few, aren't they? Read more at Democratic Underground.
Accountability: The Obameter Tracks The President's Campaign Promises
PolitiFact has compiled more than 500 promises that Barack Obama made 
during the campaign and is tracking their progress on the Obameter. Statuses are rated as No Action, In the Works or Stalled. Once an action is found to be completed, it is rated a Promise Kept, a Compromise or a Promise Broken. The report card provides an up-to-the-minute tally of all the promises.
during the campaign and is tracking their progress on the Obameter. Statuses are rated as No Action, In the Works or Stalled. Once an action is found to be completed, it is rated a Promise Kept, a Compromise or a Promise Broken. The report card provides an up-to-the-minute tally of all the promises.
Lester "Red" Rodney (1911-2009)
"It didn't make SportsCenter, but one of history's most influential sportswriters died this week at the age of 98. His name was Lester Rodney. 
Lester was one of the first people to write about a young Negro League prospect named Jackie Robinson. He was the last living journalist to cover the famous 1938 fight at Yankee Stadium between 'The Brown Bomber' Joe Louis and Hitler favorite, Max Schmeling. He crusaded against baseball's color line when almost every other journalist pretended it didn't exist. He edited a political sports page that engaged his audience in how to fight for a more just sports world. His writing, which could describe the beauty of a well-turned double play in one sentence and blast injustice in the next, is still bracing and ahead of its time. He should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Instead he was largely erased from the books."
The rest of the story: More Than a Sportswriter: Lester "Red" Rodney: 1911-2009 by Dave Zirin (Huffington Post 2009-12-23)
Reading list: Interview with Lester Rodney (Political Affairs magazine)
Press Box Red: The Story of Lester Rodney, the Communist Who Helped Break the Color Line in American Sports by Irwin Silber (Temple University Press 2003)
Lester was one of the first people to write about a young Negro League prospect named Jackie Robinson. He was the last living journalist to cover the famous 1938 fight at Yankee Stadium between 'The Brown Bomber' Joe Louis and Hitler favorite, Max Schmeling. He crusaded against baseball's color line when almost every other journalist pretended it didn't exist. He edited a political sports page that engaged his audience in how to fight for a more just sports world. His writing, which could describe the beauty of a well-turned double play in one sentence and blast injustice in the next, is still bracing and ahead of its time. He should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Instead he was largely erased from the books."The rest of the story: More Than a Sportswriter: Lester "Red" Rodney: 1911-2009 by Dave Zirin (Huffington Post 2009-12-23)
Reading list: Interview with Lester Rodney (Political Affairs magazine)
Press Box Red: The Story of Lester Rodney, the Communist Who Helped Break the Color Line in American Sports by Irwin Silber (Temple University Press 2003)
More like a wake than a christening
"Democrats have finally -- and after jettisoning any trace of government-run health care while swallowing new abortion restrictions -- found their way to success; the overnight vote proves they have the numbers to prevail in the remaining votes this week. But it certainly wasn't pretty."
The rest of the story:
An ugly finale for health-care reform by Dana Milbank (WaPo)
It's not just about the president. His successes and failures are tests of the progressive infrastructure.
"No doubt the president is one of the most compelling figures in American political history, perhaps more interesting as a person than any occupant of the White House since his moral opposite, Richard Nixon. His combination of political skill, intellect, discipline, confidence, and command of language is unprecedented, and his theory of politics, which brought with it the first actual Democratic electoral majority since 1976, may have changed the parameters of political possibility. It's hard to take your eyes off that phenomenon.
"But even world-historical figures color within lines that they do not draw themselves. What presidents, governors, or even legislators are willing and able to do is defined by forces and efforts outside of themselves. And for progressive politicians, those factors include the condition and power of the progressive coalition and its organizations -- its ability to generate and refine ideas, as well as its organizational capacity to bring pressure to bear on the political system. Every success or failure can be seen as a measure of the strength or weakness of that infrastructure."
The rest of the story: Machinery of Progress by Mark Schmitt (The American Prospect January/February 2010
"But even world-historical figures color within lines that they do not draw themselves. What presidents, governors, or even legislators are willing and able to do is defined by forces and efforts outside of themselves. And for progressive politicians, those factors include the condition and power of the progressive coalition and its organizations -- its ability to generate and refine ideas, as well as its organizational capacity to bring pressure to bear on the political system. Every success or failure can be seen as a measure of the strength or weakness of that infrastructure."
The rest of the story: Machinery of Progress by Mark Schmitt (The American Prospect January/February 2010
"Reform": Nation’s Largest RN Organization Says Health Care Bill Cedes Too Much to Insurance Industry
Damning ress release from National Nurses United:
The 150,000 member National Nurses United, the nation’s largest union and professional organization of registered nurses in the U.S., today criticized the healthcare bill now advancing in the U.S. Senate saying it is deeply flawed and grants too much power to the giant insurers.
“It is tragic to see the promise from Washington this year for genuine, comprehensive reform ground down to a seriously flawed bill that could actually exacerbate the healthcare crisis and financial insecurity for American families, and that cedes far too much additional power to the tyranny of a callous insurance industry,” said NNU co-president Karen Higgins, RN.
NNU Co-president Deborah Burger, RN challenged arguments of legislation proponents that the bill should still be passed because of expanded coverage, new regulations on insurers, and the hope that it will be improved in the House-Senate conference committee or future years.
“Those wishful statements ignore the reality that much of the expanded coverage is based on forced purchase of private insurance without effective controls on industry pricing practices or real competition and gaping loopholes in the insurance reforms,” said Burger.
Further, said NNU Co-president Jean Ross, RN, “the bill seems more likely to be eroded, not improved, in future years due to the unchecked influence of the healthcare industry lobbyists and the lessons of this year in which all the compromises have been made to the right.”
“Sadly, we have ended up with legislation that fails to meet the test of true healthcare reform, guaranteeing high quality, cost effective care for all Americans, and instead are further locking into place a system that entrenches the chokehold of the profit-making insurance giants on our health. If this bill passes, the industry will become more powerful and could be beyond the reach of reform for generations,” Higgins said.
NNU cited ten significant problems in the legislation, noting many of the same flaws also exist in the House version and are likely to remain in the bill that emerges from the House-Senate reconciliation process:1. The individual mandate forcing all those without coverage to buy private insurance, with insufficient cost controls on skyrocketing premiums and other insurance costs.“Desperation to pass a bill, regardless of its flaws, has made the White House and Congress subject to the worst political extortion and new, crippling concessions every day,” Burger said.
2. No challenge to insurance company monopolies, especially in the top 94 metropolitan areas where one or two companies dominate, severely limiting choice and competition.
3. An affordability mirage. Congressional Budget Office estimates say a family of four with a household income of $54,000 would be expected to pay 17 percent of their income, $9,000, on healthcare exposing too many families to grave financial risk.
4. The excise tax on comprehensive insurance plans which will encourage employers to reduce benefits, shift more costs to employees, promote proliferation of high-deductible plans, and lead to more self-rationing of care and medical bankruptcies, especially as more plans are subject to the tax every year due to the lack of adequate price controls. A Towers-Perrin survey in September found 30 percent of employers said they would reduce employment if their health costs go up, 86 percent said they’d pass the higher costs to their employees.
5. Major loopholes in the insurance reforms that promise bans on exclusion for pre-existing conditions, and no cancellations for sickness. The loopholes include:* Provisions permitting insurers and companies to more than double charges to employees who fail “wellness” programs because they have diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol readings, or other medical conditions.6. Minimal oversight on insurance denials of care; a report by the California Nurses Association/NNOC in September found that six of California’s largest insurers have rejected more than one-fifth of all claims since 2002.
* Insurers are permitted to sell policies “across state lines”, exempting patient protections passed in other states. Insurers will thus set up in the least regulated states in a race to the bottom threatening public protections won by consumers in various states.
* Insurers can charge four times more based on age plus more for certain conditions, and continue to use marketing techniques to cherry-pick healthier, less costly enrollees.
* Insurers may continue to rescind policies for “fraud or intentional misrepresentation” – the main pretext insurance companies now use to cancel coverage.
7. Inadequate limits on drug prices, especially after Senate rejection of an amendment, to protect a White House deal with pharmaceutical giants, allowing pharmacies and wholesalers to import lower-cost drugs.
8. New burdens for our public safety net. With a shortage of primary care physicians and a continuing fiscal crisis at the state and local level, public hospitals and clinics will be a dumping ground for those the private system doesn’t want.
9. Reduced reproductive rights for women.
10. No single standard of care. Our multi-tiered system remains with access to care still determined by ability to pay. Nothing changes in basic structure of the system; healthcare remains a privilege, not a right.
“NNU and nurses will continue to work with the thousands of grassroots activists across the nation to campaign for the best reform, which would be to expand Medicare to cover everyone, the same type of system working more effectively in every other industrial country. The day of that reform will come,” said Ross. (December 21, 2009)
Canards: "This is a conservative country."
The majority of people in the United States are progressive. 69% of Americans believe that we should begin a phased withdrawal from Iraq right now. A CBS poll March 1, 2008 says that 64% of Americans favor universal health care. An ABC/Washington Post Poll conducted from January 9-12 says that 57% favor a woman's right to have an abortion in either most or all cases. Another CBS poll says 52% of Americans believe that the U.S. government should give high priority to global warming. A survey by Lake Research shows that an overwhelming majority of voters support public campaign financing. -- from the mission statement of United Progressives, a "union" of people dedicated to such "liberal" goals as peace and economic justice.
Old school
On a Concord Trailways bus in a New Hampshire snowstorm.
Digital technology is great.
But right now I love snow tires.
quote unquote: What does the President stand for?
This has been a fairly transactional presidency, and the president did nothing to insulate himself from the compromises - which were inevitable - by making it clear at the outset what his values were on some of these important issues. While being transactional may help you get through the days in Washington and get things on the scoreboard, it creates a weird disconnect that most people in the country don't know what you want and don't feel they should rally to your side. -- Rep. Anthony Weiner D-N.Y.
The rest of the story: Under Obama, the Left feels left out (Politico 2009-12-19)
The rest of the story: Under Obama, the Left feels left out (Politico 2009-12-19)
"The insurance lobby is taking over.”
Like Bill Clinton in his first two years, Barack Obama is attempting to pass legislation pleasing to the conservatives and the corporations instead of seizing the advantage offered by big Democratic majorities to advance change in the direction of economic justice. The result, in 1996, was victory for Newt Gingrich and his Contract On America. 2010 is shaping up as another disastrous year for Democratic congressional candidates; they have been running well behind the Republicans in generic polls for months. Incumbency will be some help, but not to liberals in closely contested districts.
If the White House learned nothing from the Clinton debacle, the same can't be said veteran members of the House. Listen to some of their comments last week as the Senate ground down health care reform.
"The insurance lobby is taking over.”
If the White House learned nothing from the Clinton debacle, the same can't be said veteran members of the House. Listen to some of their comments last week as the Senate ground down health care reform.
Snowe? Stupak? Lieberman? Who left these people in charge? It’s time for the President to get his hands dirty. Some of us have compromised our compromised compromise. We need the President to stand up for the values our party shares. We must stop letting the tail wag the dog of this debate. -- Rep. Anthony Weiner, a strong backer of single-payer“The president," griped Rep. John Conyers, "keeps listening to Rahm Emanuel,” no progressive's version of a good idea. As for what's happened so far in the Senate, Conyers, who introduced single-payer legislation that had wide support from colleagues before Obama took it "off the table," says, “No public option, no extending Medicare to 55, no nothing. An excise tax, god!
It’s ridiculous, and the Obama administration is sitting on the sidelines. That’s nonsense. The White House has been useless. -- House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey
There is unbelievable frustration with the Senate. The Senate is a graveyard. They could run the place with 50 or 51 votes, but they don’t want to hurt the club. They are relying on people like Joe Lieberman, who was thrown out of the Democratic Party by the voters of his state, to tell the Democratic Party what its agenda is. That’s a very sad state of affairs. -- Rep. Peter DeFazio.
Since the Senate won’t use reconciliation, which only requires 51 votes, it doesn’t look promising for any real change. Rep. Raúl Grijalva, co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. He pledged to vote against the final bill if there is not significant movement toward the stronger House version in the conference negotiations.
Thirty percent of Democrats will not come out and vote if there is no public option in the health care bill. What does that tell you? -- Rep. Lynn Woolsey, Grijalva's co-chair.
"The insurance lobby is taking over.”
Health Care: Senate Bill Must Change to Be Real Reform - AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka
by Seth Michaels writing in the AFL-CIO Now Blog:
The health care bill being considered by the U.S. Senate is inadequate and too tilted toward the insurance industry, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said today.
In recent days, as the Senate has debated health care reform, small numbers of senators have held health care hostage by threatening to block a vote. The new proposal by the Senate puts the interests of insurance companies-and senators who would rather look out for the insurance companies-ahead of real reform.
Trumka said the top priority now is to fight over the rest of the legislative process to fix the bill and make sure we can pass real health care reform:
Subscribe to the AFL-CIO News Blog.
The health care bill being considered by the U.S. Senate is inadequate and too tilted toward the insurance industry, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said today.
In recent days, as the Senate has debated health care reform, small numbers of senators have held health care hostage by threatening to block a vote. The new proposal by the Senate puts the interests of insurance companies-and senators who would rather look out for the insurance companies-ahead of real reform.
Trumka said the top priority now is to fight over the rest of the legislative process to fix the bill and make sure we can pass real health care reform:
The labor movement has been fighting for health care for nearly 100 years and we are not about to stop fighting now, when it really matters. But for this health care bill to be worthy of the support of working men and women, substantial changes must be made. The AFL-CIO intends to fight on behalf of all working families to make those changes and win health care reform that is deserving of the name.While the Senate's bill makes a lot of important and necessary changes to our health care system, it falls short in three key areas, Trumka says.
The absolute refusal of Republicans in the Senate to support health care reform and the hijacking of the bill by defenders of the insurance industry have brought us a Senate bill that is inadequate: It is too kind to the insurance industry.
Genuine health care reform must bring down health costs, hold insurance companies accountable, assure that Americans can get the health care they need and be financed fairly.
It lacks a public health insurance option, to offer real competition to insurance companies to bring down costs.Trumka says:
It fails to make sure employers take responsibility and pay their fair share.
It's funded through a new tax on working families' health care benefits.
It doesn't have to be this way. The bill passed by the U.S. House is far better than the Senate's bill on these and other measures. The House bill finances health care through a small tax on the very wealthiest of earners-those who reaped vast benefits from the Bush tax cuts-and it includes a public health insurance plan and real responsibility for employers.
The House bill is the model for genuine health care reform. Working people cannot accept anything less than real reform.
Subscribe to the AFL-CIO News Blog.
It's on you, BHK
"President Obama will have to argue his own case to House Democrats as he seeks support for a planned surge of 30,000 troops into Afghanistan, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Wednesday, adding that she is finished asking her colleagues to back wars that they do not support. "The president's going to have to make his case," Pelosi told reporters.
Pelosi says rallying votes for troop surge in Afghanistan will be Obama's job by Paul Kane (Washington Post)
Pelosi says rallying votes for troop surge in Afghanistan will be Obama's job by Paul Kane (Washington Post)
Ike warned us; we just didn't listen.
The $150,000,000,000 expended by the U.S. government since 1985 on the chimerical missile shield is five times the cost of the Manhattan Project & Apollo 11 combined, says Harper's.
A Flawed and Dangerous U.S. Missile Defense Plan by George N. Lewis and Theodore A. Postol (Arms Control Association)
True story
Last night in Concord, New Hampshire, I went to a bar called "Cheers."
No one knew my name.
AfPak: Congress will debate war policy in January
It is the job of the legislature, not the chief executive, to decide questions of war and peace. In January, the Congress will debate whether the war in Afghanistan and military operations in Pakistan will continue and, if so, with what degree of intensity. In this video, Rep. Dennis Kucinich makes the case for the legislature's constitutional responsibilities.
Actions:
Call Afghanistan - A Petition to Take Action Against the War
Contact your representatives in Congress
Actions:
Call Afghanistan - A Petition to Take Action Against the War
Contact your representatives in Congress
Female Vets Face Homelessness, Dearth of Services
"...the new faces among America's homeless veterans.
"They're younger than homeless male veterans and more likely to bring children. Their number has doubled in the past decade, and there are an estimated 6,500 homeless female veterans on any given night - about 5 percent of the total homeless veterans population.
"But women-only programs...are few.
"'It is always hard to find a place or resources or help when you are homeless,' said Sen. Patty Murray, a member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee. 'It is almost impossible if you are a woman. Most of the VA facilities cater to men, and you can't take a mom with two little kids and put her in the middle of a homeless center with 30 or 40 male veterans,' said Murray, D-Wash.
"The distressed economy only made things worse....
"Like male veterans, many homeless female veterans face substance abuse and mental health problems. Many also struggle with sexual trauma that occurred in their childhood, in the military, or elsewhere."
The rest of the story: Female Vets Face Homelessness, Dearth of Services by Kimberly Hefling (Associated Press 2009-12-15)
Resources: U.S. Vets
Department of Veterans Affairs
National Alliance to End Homelessness
Iraq and Afghanistan Veteran of America's report on female veterans (pdf)
"They're younger than homeless male veterans and more likely to bring children. Their number has doubled in the past decade, and there are an estimated 6,500 homeless female veterans on any given night - about 5 percent of the total homeless veterans population.
"But women-only programs...are few.
"'It is always hard to find a place or resources or help when you are homeless,' said Sen. Patty Murray, a member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee. 'It is almost impossible if you are a woman. Most of the VA facilities cater to men, and you can't take a mom with two little kids and put her in the middle of a homeless center with 30 or 40 male veterans,' said Murray, D-Wash.
"The distressed economy only made things worse....
"Like male veterans, many homeless female veterans face substance abuse and mental health problems. Many also struggle with sexual trauma that occurred in their childhood, in the military, or elsewhere."
The rest of the story: Female Vets Face Homelessness, Dearth of Services by Kimberly Hefling (Associated Press 2009-12-15)
Resources: U.S. Vets
Department of Veterans Affairs
National Alliance to End Homelessness
Iraq and Afghanistan Veteran of America's report on female veterans (pdf)
Dems: Pass the fake health care insurance company bailout bill
Speaker Boehner and President Gingrich will thank you.
Dr. Howard Dean, M.D. is right
Howard Dean says the Senate health care bill isn't worth passing--that it signifies "the collapse of health care reform in the United States Senate" and that it's "a bigger bailout for the insurance industry than AIG." Dean: Kill the Bill by Chris Good (The Atlantic)
Howard Dean's is right on health-care reform
"Give credit to Howard Dean. This still practicing physician, former governor of Vermont, former chair of the Democratic Party and former Democratic presidential candidate has called for progressive members of Congress in both houses to join their Republican colleagues in killing what he rightly says has become 'an insurance company's dream.'
But it's not just a bad bill.
It's morally outrageous, politically repugnant and economically dangerous.
And an electoral Christmas gift for the GOP.
...
"Doctors will get richer under this 'reform.' Insurance companies will get vastly richer under this 'reform.' Pharmaceutical companies will get richer under this 'reform.' But there will still be millions of people left with no access to health care. There will still be tens of millions of people who will get substandard or even pathetically trashy health care. And the cost of medical care, both for individuals and for society as a whole, already the highest in the world, will continue to soar.
...
"Dr. Dean is right. This is indeed a bad bill. But it's not just a bad bill. It is a morally outrageous, politically disgusting and economically dangerous bill. It moves the country in exactly the wrong direction -- not towards the socialism that the right has been decrying, but towards an increasingly costly corporatist system that will be even harder to reform down the road."
The rest of the story:
The Democrats' Health 'Reform' Bill: Kill It Before It Comes to Life! by Dave Lindorff (OpEd News)
Health Care Reform: Howard Dean calls for a universally available public option -- like Medicare For All
By now, you've heard that Howard Dean has gone off the reservation.
Action: Sign the petition at Stand with Dr. Dean
If I were a senator, I would not vote for the current health-care bill. Any measure that expands private insurers' monopoly over health care and transfers millions of taxpayer dollars to private corporations is not real health-care reform. Real reform would insert competition into insurance markets, force insurers to cut unnecessary administrative expenses and spend health-care dollars caring for people. Real reform would significantly lower costs, improve the delivery of health care and give all Americans a meaningful choice of coverage. The current Senate bill accomplishes none of these.It looks like Dr. Dean is right and his critics wrong. As they could have done in the first place, the White House and the leadership should stand behind the House bill and, using reconciliation, push it through the Senate with a simple majority. The Republicans used to get a lot more done with 55 votes than the Democrats have been able to accomplish with 60. Time to get this done, but it needs to be done right.
Real health-care reform is supposed to eliminate discrimination based on preexisting conditions. But the legislation allows insurance companies to charge older Americans up to three times as much as younger Americans, pricing them out of coverage. The bill was supposed to give Americans choices about what kind of system they wanted to enroll in. Instead, it fines Americans if they do not sign up with an insurance company, which may take up to 30 percent of your premium dollars and spend it on CEO salaries -- in the range of $20 million a year -- and on return on equity for the company's shareholders. Few Americans will see any benefit until 2014, by which time premiums are likely to have doubled. In short, the winners in this bill are insurance companies; the American taxpayer is about to be fleeced with a bailout in a situation that dwarfs even what happened at AIG.
Action: Sign the petition at Stand with Dr. Dean
The Livable City: Parks & Rec
My second book, a collection of essays intended to deliver the insights generated by the social sciences to students and practitioners of the 
design professions, had on its cover a photograph of a popular Manhattan minipark, part of a program originally proposed in the mid-60s by Thomas Hoving when he was briefly New York City's parks commissioner. In the years since, with no small effort by neighborhood residents and community activists from coast to coast, miniparks, pocket parks and public gardens have helped to ameliorate the urban landscape.
See, also: Turn Yards Into Parks by John Gabree (Impractical Proposals 2004-06)
Urban Oases: New York's Great Pocket Parks & Secret Gardens by Jacquelin Carnegie (Frommer's 2009-06-18)
Shocking Video Shows Los Angeles City Bulldozing Community Gardens Into the Dirt by Mike Adams (Natural News 2009-02-15)
Showdown at South Central Farm by Robert Gottlieb (Next American City)
Resources: Pocket Parks - StreetWiki (LivableStreets Initiative)
Pocket Parks gallery (Project for Public Spaces)
Los Angeles Community Garden Council
Los Angeles County Common Ground Garden Program
design professions, had on its cover a photograph of a popular Manhattan minipark, part of a program originally proposed in the mid-60s by Thomas Hoving when he was briefly New York City's parks commissioner. In the years since, with no small effort by neighborhood residents and community activists from coast to coast, miniparks, pocket parks and public gardens have helped to ameliorate the urban landscape.Pocket parks — also known as miniparks and vest-pocket parks — are small patches of landscaped nature generally built on vacant building lots or scraps of city land that fall between the cracks of real estate interests.The rest of the story: City of Earthy Delights by George Prochnik (New York Times 2009-12-12)
Jacob Riis, the urban reformer, is credited with inventing the pocket-park concept in 1897, when he served as the secretary of a city committee on small parks. The committee issued a statement declaring that “any unused corner, triangle or vacant lot kept off the market by litigation or otherwise may serve this purpose well.” Though turn-of-the-last-century New York was filled with spaces that fit the bill, Riis’s idea went largely unrealized until after World War II, when bombed-out building sites in European cities provided opportunities to create small parks at less cost than reconstruction would have entailed.
Hoving may have seen parallels between New York’s crumbling urban landscape and Europe’s war-ravaged capitals when he started his micro-park effort in 1966. That year, he identified 378 vacant lots and 346 abandoned buildings in Bedford-Stuyvesant alone.
“Utopia would mean a park — some large, some small — every four or five blocks,” he declared. These micro-oases could spring up in the middle of dense, socially fractious neighborhoods where, he believed, they had the potential to “create wider ripples of reform.” One thousand new pocket parks would mean adding only 140 acres to the city’s park acreage. Two hundred could be acquired and developed for less than 10 percent of his department’s annual budget.
See, also: Turn Yards Into Parks by John Gabree (Impractical Proposals 2004-06)
Urban Oases: New York's Great Pocket Parks & Secret Gardens by Jacquelin Carnegie (Frommer's 2009-06-18)
Shocking Video Shows Los Angeles City Bulldozing Community Gardens Into the Dirt by Mike Adams (Natural News 2009-02-15)
Showdown at South Central Farm by Robert Gottlieb (Next American City)
Resources: Pocket Parks - StreetWiki (LivableStreets Initiative)
Pocket Parks gallery (Project for Public Spaces)
Los Angeles Community Garden Council
Los Angeles County Common Ground Garden Program
Zabriskie Pointless
Here's something you probably haven't thought about in a while. And wait'll you see the pacing on the Dick Cavette interview.
The rest of the story:
The Zabriskie Point Fallout (With Mel Brooks) by Bradley Novicoff (Dangerous Minds)
The Zabriskie Point Fallout (With Mel Brooks) by Bradley Novicoff (Dangerous Minds)
Congressman Kucinich’s Response to President Obama’s “Just War” Doctrine
A rhetorician as accomplished as Barack Obama knows exactly what he is doing when he attempts to alter the clear and simple meaning of words. It is a dangerous game, and one that will not help him in the long run.
Yesterday, our president mused about the inevitability of war, war’s instrumentality in the pursuit of peace and just wars. It is important for us to reflect on his words, because once we believe in the inevitability of war, war becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Once we are committed to war’s instrumentality in pursuit of peace, we begin the Orwellian journey to the semantic netherworld where War IS Peace, where the momentum of war overwhelms hopes for peace. And once we wrap doctrines perpetuating war in the arms of justice, we can easily legitimate the wholesale slaughter of innocents. The war against Iraq was based on lies. Wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan are based on flawed doctrines of counter-insurgency. War is often not just; sometimes it is just war. And our ability to rethink the terms of our existence, to explore the possibility of peace without war, may well determine whether we end war, or war ends us. -- Rep. Dennis Kucinich
The President's Decision on Afghanistan Is Wrong. Bring Them Home -- Ed Koch
"...I believe we cannot and should not continue the spilling of American blood with the consequent deaths and casualties, and massive expenditure of funds we don't have. On the issue of expense, The Times reported that '[t]he economic cost was troubling [President Obama] as well after he received a private budget memo estimating that an expanded presence would cost $1 trillion over 10 years, roughly the same as his health care plan.'
"We should defend our homeland from all enemies, no matter the cost. However, we will be more effective in our battles against terrorists in both Afghanistan and Pakistan if we attack the terrorists from offshore bases and do not continue to be involved in a land war or, worse still, expand that land war. Next year, there will be the bi-annual Congressional elections - the entire House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate. Two issues will dominate the election - loss of jobs and the ongoing war. The Democrats will be held responsible for both and will lose their majority in both Houses if either or especially both continue." - Ed Koch (Real Clear Politics 2009-12-09)
"We should defend our homeland from all enemies, no matter the cost. However, we will be more effective in our battles against terrorists in both Afghanistan and Pakistan if we attack the terrorists from offshore bases and do not continue to be involved in a land war or, worse still, expand that land war. Next year, there will be the bi-annual Congressional elections - the entire House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate. Two issues will dominate the election - loss of jobs and the ongoing war. The Democrats will be held responsible for both and will lose their majority in both Houses if either or especially both continue." - Ed Koch (Real Clear Politics 2009-12-09)
Accountability: Congress should take back its constitutionally mandated role in making military policy
Despite Newsweek's silly cover story this week on The Post-Imperial Presidency (for starters, Newsweek might look at plans for military expansion in Africa, the takeover of air facilities in Columbia, the exponential growth of our military presence on Guam, Obama's increase by many multiples in the use of pilotless aircraft in the undeclared invasion of Pakistan, the grotesque $680 billion 2010 DOD budget, the tens of billions of dollars in war funding Congress is poised to pass quickly this session, and the additional supplemental spending bill that will arrive early next year to support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan...), there really was some hope last year that, if he became president, Barack Obama would rein in the abuses of power that get tarted up in the rhetoric of unitary executive theory.
On the more limited matter of war making, in this video The Nation's political correspondent John Nichols "sheds light on the American founding principle that presidents cannot define the debate about wars -- and reminds us that it is up to Congress, not the Commander-in-Chief, to set the debate and the terms of war." As the White House pursues its escalation of the war in Afghanistan, Nichols points out, Congress can still do its duty, starting with support for a sensible "war surtax" that will make the wealthiest Americans pay more so that the cost of the war is covered by concurrent revenues.
See, also: Grijalva Pushes to Block War Funding (AfterDowningStreet.Org 2009-12-08, reprinted from Roll Call)
On the more limited matter of war making, in this video The Nation's political correspondent John Nichols "sheds light on the American founding principle that presidents cannot define the debate about wars -- and reminds us that it is up to Congress, not the Commander-in-Chief, to set the debate and the terms of war." As the White House pursues its escalation of the war in Afghanistan, Nichols points out, Congress can still do its duty, starting with support for a sensible "war surtax" that will make the wealthiest Americans pay more so that the cost of the war is covered by concurrent revenues.
See, also: Grijalva Pushes to Block War Funding (AfterDowningStreet.Org 2009-12-08, reprinted from Roll Call)
Tech Porn: The Osprey finally goes to war
"CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan -- When a couple of MV-22 Osprey tilt rotors joined a fleet of CH-53 helicopters, dropping out of the predawn darkness Friday in the northern end of the Now Zad valley in Helmand Province to deliver the first of more than 1,000 NATO and Afghan troops, it marked not only the first large assault since President Obama's announcement that the U.S. would be sending more troops here, it also was the first major combat operation for the Osprey.
"The Marines are hoping that the operation - a sweep to begin to secure the area around the city of Now Zad dubbed Cobra's Anger - will become a key step toward resuscitating the image of the Osprey, which can take off and land like a helicopter, but in the air can tilt its motors forward to fly like a fixed-wing plane." -- from The Osprey Goes to War (Military.com 2009-12-07)
"The Marines are hoping that the operation - a sweep to begin to secure the area around the city of Now Zad dubbed Cobra's Anger - will become a key step toward resuscitating the image of the Osprey, which can take off and land like a helicopter, but in the air can tilt its motors forward to fly like a fixed-wing plane." -- from The Osprey Goes to War (Military.com 2009-12-07)
Why welfare reform fails its recession test
"When President Bill Clinton signed welfare reform into law, he didn't just end welfare as we knew it. For all practical purposes, it turned out, he brought an end to cash help of any kind for families with children in much of the country. While welfare reform was long ago declared a success in some quarters, it was deeply flawed from the beginning. The recession has shown how seriously unprepared it left us for hard times." - Peter Edelman and Barbara Ehrenreich (Washington Post 2009-12-06).
Wrecked town points the way to economic recovery
With all eyes on US efforts to combat climate change at next week's UN summit in Copenhagen, one Kansas town is going green in a big way -- and setting an example for American communities.
The U.S. dominated the world economy in the 1950s and 1960s partly because its infrastructure was unparalleled. Without going in to other reasons for our long, slow decline since the early 1970s, any discussion of the process by which this nation can be restored to greatness must begin with how we will rebuild our physical plant. One small Kansas town is providing lessons in the ways disaster can be greeted as opportunity. Lets hope it won't require that conditions become as dire in the rest of the country as they have in Greensburg before we are motivated to act.
The rest of the story: Destroyed US town a model of eco-living as it rebuilds (Agence France Presse/AlterNet)
See, also:
After tornado, town rebuilds by going green (CNN.com 2009-04-29)
Greensburg, Kansas: Rebuilding After the May 4, 2007, Tornado (Earth Gauge 2009-03)
Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas (EPA)
Better, Stronger, Greener! — City of Greensburg, Kansas (local government site)
Greensburg GreenTown (nonprofit)
The U.S. dominated the world economy in the 1950s and 1960s partly because its infrastructure was unparalleled. Without going in to other reasons for our long, slow decline since the early 1970s, any discussion of the process by which this nation can be restored to greatness must begin with how we will rebuild our physical plant. One small Kansas town is providing lessons in the ways disaster can be greeted as opportunity. Lets hope it won't require that conditions become as dire in the rest of the country as they have in Greensburg before we are motivated to act.
On the evening of May 4, 2007, a category-five tornado swept through the rural midwestern town of Greensburg, killing nine people and obliterating 95 percent ofthe urban landscape, including the school, the hospital and more than 900 houses.
But this community of 1,400 is rebuilding stronger than ever, in a remarkable comeback billed by Greensburg GreenTown -- a grassroots organization involving town residents, local officials and business owners -- as a "model for sustainable building and green living."
In the wake of disaster, local leaders vowed to rebuild their town as the first in the United States to have all municipal projects constructed to the highest environmental and efficiency design standards.
The rest of the story: Destroyed US town a model of eco-living as it rebuilds (Agence France Presse/AlterNet)
See, also:
After tornado, town rebuilds by going green (CNN.com 2009-04-29)
Greensburg, Kansas: Rebuilding After the May 4, 2007, Tornado (Earth Gauge 2009-03)
Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas (EPA)
Better, Stronger, Greener! — City of Greensburg, Kansas (local government site)
Greensburg GreenTown (nonprofit)
Middle class?
One fifth of the U.S. population is unemployed, underemployed or has given up looking for work. One in every nine families can't make minimum credit card payments. Of eight mortgages, one is in default or foreclosure. Over 12% of the people is on food stamps. More than 120,000 families file for bankruptcy every month. The economic crisis has wiped more than $5 trillion from pensions and savings, left family balance sheets upside down, and threatens to put ten million homeowners on the street.
What middle class?
What middle class?
Primum non nocere
Shouldn't there be some form of Hippocratic Oath for planners, designers and architects?
It is as tragic as it is absurd that we are eating the dust of Europe and Asia in the development of green technology. Take this light 'triple-zero' house in the EU that produces more energy than it uses.
The rest of the story: Lightweight 'triple-zero' house produces more energy than it uses by Carina Storrs (Scientific American 2009-12-05)
It is as tragic as it is absurd that we are eating the dust of Europe and Asia in the development of green technology. Take this light 'triple-zero' house in the EU that produces more energy than it uses.
Overlooking the city of Stuttgart in southern Germany, a four-story modern glass house stands like a beacon of environmental sustainability. Built in 2000, it was the first in a series of buildings that are "triple-zero," a concept developed by German architect and engineer Werner Sobek, which signifies that the building is energyThe most recent addition to triple-zero house raises the bar for energy efficiency: It produces more energy than it uses.self-sufficient (zero energy consumed), produces zero emissions, and is made entirely of recyclable materials (zero waste).
Since the construction of the first triple-zero home, Werner Sobek's firm of engineers and architects, based in Stuttgart, has designed and built five more in Germany, with a seventh planned in France. The energy used by these buildings, including the four-story tower where Sobek resides, comes from solar cells and geothermal heating.
The rest of the story: Lightweight 'triple-zero' house produces more energy than it uses by Carina Storrs (Scientific American 2009-12-05)
(sic)
“With all of the comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis, young people are beginning to think that the allied powers defeated Nazi Germany because Germany had too much health care.” — Jim Hansen
A rose by any other name...
Withdrawal?
There are 17% fewer troops in Iraq since Obama's inauguration.
On the other hand, the number of armed U.S. private contractors has increased 52%.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
