...so near to the United States.
How much of the refugee crisis in the Americas is caused by our own actions?
And at least one more, in Venezuela, almost certain soon to come.
"The four countries discussed in this report [see, below], Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, share a history as well as contemporary social and economic characteristics. The Spanish colonial period, which lasted from the early sixteenth century until 1821, laid certain institutional foundations whose legacies are still in place. Two legacies stand out: concentration of land in the hands of a small powerful elite and the exploitation of the indigenous labour force. The economies of all four countries are dominated by a handful of extremely rich families while the overwhelming majority is socially marginalized, economically and politically excluded, and suffers the lacerating effects of poverty, racism and discrimination. Moreover, the bloody internal conflicts of the 1970s and 1980s produced large-scale displacement, economic hardship, and debilitating fear. The recent surge of everyday violence rips into the most vulnerable, but society as a whole suffers from the instability resulting from the failure to reign in criminal activity.
"The new gang-related violence can be attributed to several factors including decades of internal wars and impunity, extensive displacement to urban areas, the absence of social and economic programmes to integrate the youth, the migration to the United States, and the over all social exclusion of a large proportion of the population. The continuation of death squad violence and the expansion of the drug trade is a reflection of the absence of the rule of law as well as the continued links between these clandestine organizations and the military and other power elites.
"The harsh response to the variety of gang activities in Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras has proved ineffective. While the problems are real, the government and the press find it more expedient to target the gangs and street children for virtually all the rampant violence in the society. In response, many citizens support draconian anti-gang laws and self-help “social cleansing” practices. In the process, the more powerful clandestine organized crime units tend to be overlooked, in part because of the links, influence and control they exercise at various institutional levels in the governments. Nicaragua, while the poorest country in Central America, has fewer gangs and less violence and its government’s alternative approach to rehabilitate and integrate gang members into society has been much more successful.
"Violence against women is an extremely serious problem. These crimes are seldom solved or punished, creating further fear and vulnerability among women. Crimes against homosexuals are less identified and are also likely under-reported. Politically motivated violence against party workers, human rights defenders, and professionals dedicated to investigating and bringing to justice those responsible for these crimes, especially in Guatemala, has seen an alarming rise. The judicial system and the police have proved largely to be ineffective. The serious instability and danger resulting from violence and the failure of national protection leads to displacement and migration out of the country, especially to the United States. These undocumented migrants live in limbo with the increasing threat of deportation back to the country they fled, often in fear for their lives."
From Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua): Patterns of Human Rights Violations (pdf) by Beatriz Manz (University of California, Berkeley) commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees,
Status Determination and Protection Information Section (DIPS) (Writenet Independent Analysis).
Writenet is a network of researchers and writers on human rights, forced migration, ethnic and political conflict.
See image larger.
(Resource: GreenNet is not-for-profit collective, established in 1985, providing internet services, web design and hosting to supporters of peace, the environment and human rights.)
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Leadership
Bill Clinton is angling to seat a surrogate in the Oval Office. George Bush I is jumping out of airplanes. George Bush II is painting pictures of his feet. And Jimmy Carter?
"I have been a practicing Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be 'subservient' to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service. The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views." -- Jimmy Carter, president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.
Labels:
civil rights,
fundamentalism,
human rights,
Jimmy Carter,
leadership,
religion,
religious right,
women
Barbarism in Louisiana
Glenn Ford, a black man wrongfully convicted of murder by an all-white jury in Louisiana in 1984, a man who has spent the last 30 years on death row for a crime he did not commit following a trial filled with constitutional violations, is on the verge of being set free. Once that happens (and it could happen as soon as tomorrow after a hearing in the case) he will become one of the longest-serving death row inmates in modern American history to be exonerated and released.
Ford’s dogged lawyers and enlightened parish prosecutors in Shreveport both filed motions late last week informing a state trial judge that the time has come now to vacate Ford’s murder conviction and death sentence. Why? Because prosecutors now say that they learned, late last year, of “credible evidence” that Ford “was neither present at, nor a participant in, the robbery and murder” of the victim in his case, a man named Isadore Rozeman. -- Andrew Cohen (The Atlantic)“After 30 years, Louisiana’s longest-serving death row prisoner will get his freedom soon. Glenn Ford is living proof of just how flawed our justice system truly is. We are moved that Mr. Ford, an African American man convicted by an all-white jury, will be able to leave death row a survivor. We are more determined than ever to put an end to the death penalty, once and for all.” -- Thenjiwe Tameika McHarris, Amnesty International USA Senior Campaigner
The rest of the story:
✓ Death Penalty (Amnesty International)
✓ A case involving a black man convicted by an all-white jury in Louisiana decades ago may be reopened: Freedom After 30 Years on Death Row by Andrew Cohen (The Atlantic)
Labels:
capital punishment,
death penalty,
human rights,
louisiana
H2O is the new oil: Water, water everywhere? Not so much
Thousands have lived without love, not one without water. -- W.H.AudenIt is now almost six years since the people of Uruguay voted to make access to fresh water a human right. In the years since, the race to privatize the world's fresh water supply has accelerated, encouraged by the water privatization policies of the World Bank.
By almost two to one, Uruguayans elected to amend their constitution to ensure not only that access to piped water and sanitation is a fundamental human value, available to everyone, but also that in planning and policies affecting water, social rights and needs take precedence over economic considerations. Further, it is now national policy in Uruguay that the “public service of water supply for human consumption will be served exclusively and directly by state legal persons,” i.e., not by for-profit companies.
The referendum in the South American nation, the result of a two-year grassroots fight led by a network of trade unions, human rights groups, and environmental organizations, gave a boost (pdf) to the international civil society water movement that hopes to spread the principles reflected in the amendment to other countries and regions and to enshrine the right to water in international agreements.
The world’s water crisis due to pollution, climate change and a surging population growth is of such magnitude that close to two billion people now live in water-stressed regions of the planet. By the year 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population will face water scarcity. The global population tripled in the twentieth century, but water consumption went up sevenfold. By 2050, after we add another three billion to the population, humans will need an 80 percent increase in water supplies just to feed ourselves. No one knows where this water is going to come from. -- Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water
Action: Join the People's Water Forum in defense of water as a human right, a public good, and a central component of the global commons.
Further reading:
-> Our Water Commons: Towards a new freshwater narrative by Maude Barlow (pdf) (The Council of Canadians, onthecommons.org)
-> Right to Water: From Concept to Implementation by Celine Dubreuil (pdf) (World Water Council 2006).
-> International Conference on the Right to Water and Sanitation in Theory and Practice - Conference Programme and Abstracts (University of Oslo, University of Oxford, United Nations Development Programme - Oslo 2009-11-26/27)
-> Social movements are working hard in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay to put water services that were privatized in the 1990s back in state hands. -- Who Controls the Water? by Marcela Valente (IPS 2006-07-21).
-> Campaign in Colombia Seeks to Make Water a Constitutional Right by Helda MartÃnez (IPS 2007-08-29).
-> Cochabamba, the Water Wars and Climate Change by Amy Goodman (Democracy Now! 2010-04-21)
-> Is access to clean water a basic human right? So far, the U.S. says no by Yigal Schleifer (The Christian Science Monitor 2009-03-19).
-> Historical background on Privatizing U.S. Water (Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy 2007)
-> The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource by Stephen Lendman (Baltimore Chronicle 2010-03-09).
Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water by Maude Barlow (New Press 2008-9 - the paperback edition arrives on Saturday 2010-05-15) is a cool, clear, thorough and authoritative overview of a crisis that stretches from North America -- Barlow predicts that as many as 36 states could reach a water crisis in five years -- to Africa and Asia, where desertification has destroyed once vast water resources such as Lake Chad and the Aral Sea.
Clip File: Row over Afghan wife-starving legislation
The Beeb News reports that critics think President Hamid Karzai is betraying Afghan women.
The rest of the story: Row over Afghan wife-starving law by Sarah Rainsford (BBC News 2009-08-15)
An Afghan bill allowing a husband to starve his wife if she refuses to have sex has been published in the official gazette and become law.Maybe we would have an easier time understanding what our late entry in The Great Game will get us if we stopped calling our client "Afghanistan" and started using its real name, The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
The rest of the story: Row over Afghan wife-starving law by Sarah Rainsford (BBC News 2009-08-15)
Labels:
Afghanistan,
human rights,
war
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

